Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41683002›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Recent Applications of Machine Learning Algorithms for Pesticide Analysis in Food Samples.

Yerkanat Syrgabek, José Bernal, Adrián Fuente-Ballesteros

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yerkanat SyrgabekCenter of Physical-Chemical Methods of Research and Analysis, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Tole bi Avenue 96a, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-2165-1294
José BernalAnalytical Chemistry Group (TESEA), I. U. CINQUIMA, Faculty of Sciences, University of Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8618-3543
Adrián Fuente-BallesterosAnalytical Chemistry Group (TESEA), I. U. CINQUIMA, Faculty of Sciences, University of Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4150-4611

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable monitoring of pesticide residues is essential for ensuring food safety. Conventional chromatographic and spectrometric techniques remain labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly. Recent progress in Machine Learning (ML) provides computational tools that improve the precision and efficiency of pesticide residue detection in diverse food matrices. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of current ML-based approaches for pesticide analysis, with particular attention to supervised learning algorithms such as support vector machines, random forests, boosting methods, and deep neural networks. These models have been integrated with chromatographic, spectroscopic, and electrochemical platforms to achieve enhanced signal interpretation and more reliable prediction from existing analytical data, and more robust data processing in complex food systems. The review also discusses methodologies for feature extraction, model validation, and the management of heterogeneous datasets, while examining ongoing challenges that include limited training data, matrix variability, and regulatory constraints. Emerging advances in deep learning architectures, transfer learning strategies, and portable sensing technologies are expected to support the development of real-time, field-ready monitoring systems. The findings highlight the potential of ML to advance food quality assurance and strengthen public health protection through more efficient and accurate pesticide residue detection.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencechromatographyfoodMachine Learningpesticidesample preparation

Identifiers

PMID41683002
PMCPMC12896640

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.