Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41683154›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Nonthermal Pretreatment Technologies to Improve Drying Efficiency and Quality in Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables: A Comprehensive Review.

Nemanja Miletić, Alexander Lukyanov, Marko Petković

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nemanja MiletićFaculty of Agronomy in Čačak, University of Kragujevac, Cara Dušana 34, 32102 Čačak, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-6373-7849
Alexander LukyanovDepartment of Automation of Production Processes, Don State Technical University, Gagarin sq. 1, 344002 Rostov-on-Don, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3827-6569
Marko PetkovićFaculty of Agronomy in Čačak, University of Kragujevac, Cara Dušana 34, 32102 Čačak, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8490-4602

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preservation of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables through dehydration is undergoing a paradigm shift to overcome quality degradation and high energy intensity associated with conventional thermal drying. This review synthesizes advancements in innovative pretreatments, focusing on their mechanisms, synergistic effects, and industrial readiness. Non-thermal pretreatment (NTP) methods-including Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF), Ultrasound (US), Cold Plasma (CP), and High-Pressure Processing (HPP)-are evaluated alongside optimized Osmotic Dehydration (OD) and Freeze-Thaw (FT) cycles. Analysis reveals these technologies enhance drying kinetics, reducing processing time by 20-55%, while improving bioactive retention by 30-95%. A critical discussion of Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) distinguishes commercially mature solutions like OD (TRL 9) and HPP (TRL 8-9) from emerging pilot-scale concepts like US and PEF (TRL 6-7). Cold Plasma remains at TRL 4-5 due to uniformity challenges. Furthermore, the higher capital expenditure of innovative systems is mitigated by operational energy savings (up to 50%) and "clean label" premiums. This paper provides a strategic framework to optimize pretreatment selection based on tissue matrices and economic viability.

Indexed as

cold plasmacombined pretreatmentsfreeze-thawfresh-cuthigh-pressure processingosmotic dehydrationpulsed electric fieldultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41683154
PMCPMC12896815

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.