Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41683196›Full record

ReviewNutrients2026

Prebiotics and Gut Health: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Future Directions.

Cinara Regina A V Monteiro, Eduarda G Bogea, Carmem D L Campos, José L Pereira-Filho, Viviane S S Almeida, André A M Vale, Ana Paula S Azevedo-Santos, Valério Monteiro-Neto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Polysaccharides and carbohydrate polymers: innovations from nature to industry.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cinara Regina A V MonteiroCenter of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, Bacanga Campus, São Luís 65080-805, MA, Brazil.
Eduarda G BogeaCenter of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, Bacanga Campus, São Luís 65080-805, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2656-8238
Carmem D L CamposCenter of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, Bacanga Campus, São Luís 65080-805, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7723-0662
José L Pereira-FilhoCenter of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, Bacanga Campus, São Luís 65080-805, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7163-3831
Viviane S S AlmeidaCenter of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, Bacanga Campus, São Luís 65080-805, MA, Brazil.
André A M ValeCenter of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, Bacanga Campus, São Luís 65080-805, MA, Brazil.
Ana Paula S Azevedo-SantosCenter of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, Bacanga Campus, São Luís 65080-805, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6404-0103
Valério Monteiro-NetoCenter of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, Bacanga Campus, São Luís 65080-805, MA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2868-1314

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão FAPEMA/CAPES ACT-05691/21National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 317186/2023-0National Council for Scientific and Technological Development Pró-Amazônia/CNPq process 445615/2024-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesPrebiotics, which are non-digestible compounds that selectively modulate gut microbiota, are recognized for their potential to promote host health. Although their bifidogenic effect is well documented, a systematic synthesis of how this microbial modulation translates into clinical gastrointestinal (GI) and metabolic outcomes across diverse populations is needed. This review aims to integrate mechanistic insights with clinical evidence to elucidate the pathway from prebiotic structures to tangible health benefits.

methodsThis comprehensive narrative review details the structural properties of major prebiotics (e.g., inulin, FOS, and GOS) that govern their fermentation and the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). To evaluate clinical efficacy, an analysis of 22 randomized controlled trials from the past decade was conducted, focusing on human studies that utilized ISAPP-recognized prebiotics as the sole intervention.

resultsThe analysis confirms that prebiotic supplementation consistently increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria (e.g.,

conclusionsPrebiotics are effective modulators of gut health, driving clinical benefits through selective microbial fermentation and SCFA production. The documented heterogeneity and variability highlight the need for future research to focus on personalized nutritional strategies. Key priorities include standardizing intervention protocols, elucidating dose-response relationships, integrating multi-omics data to link taxonomy to function, and exploring novel applications such as synbiotic formulations and gut-brain axis modulation.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractPrebioticsFatty Acids, VolatileFermentationHumansIntestinal Barrier FunctionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFatty Acids, VolatilePrebioticsgastrointestinal healthgut microbiotaintestinal barrierpersonalized nutritionprebioticsrandomized controlled trialsshort-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)synbiotics

Identifiers

PMID41683196
PMCPMC12899272

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.