Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684156›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2026

Using genomic selection to examine subgenome dominance and epistasis in allopolyploid strawberry.

Joshua A Sleper, Camila F Azevedo, Luis F Ferrao, Vance M Whitaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua A SleperPlant Breeding Graduate Program, Horticultural Sciences Department, IFAS Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Wimauma, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0222-996X
Camila F AzevedoApplied Statistics and Biometry Program, Department of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Luis F FerraoPlant Breeding Graduate Program, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9655-4838
Vance M WhitakerPlant Breeding Graduate Program, Horticultural Sciences Department, IFAS Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Wimauma, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-3019

Funding

Florida Agricultural Experiment StationFlorida Strawberry Research and Education FoundationNational Institute of Food and Agriculture 2014-51181-22378National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-51181-26833National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-51181-38328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allopolyploids are organisms that possess multiple sets of chromosomes derived from distinct ancestral species, resulting in multiple subgenomes. Many important crops are allopolyploid, including wheat (Triticum aestivum), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), coffee (Coffea arabica), and strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). In allopolyploids, subgenome dominance often emerges, with strong influence on gene expression, epigenetic regulation, and gene conservation. Subgenome dominance has been extensively characterized at the molecular level but very little at the phenotypic level. In this study, we investigated the importance of subgenome interactions for predicting nine phenotypes using a large dataset of 6718 genotypes from the University of Florida strawberry breeding population. We tested multi-kernel genomic selection models accounting for subgenome and epistasis effects to test the genetic contribution of each ancestral strawberry subgenome. Across three yield-related phenotypes, two fruit quality phenotypes, and four disease resistance phenotypes, the contributions of the four subgenomes were highly variable. On average, subgenome B contributed the most genetic variation, followed by subgenome A, then subgenome C, and lastly subgenome D. Using genomic selection models with epistasis kernels, we estimate that epistasis contributed between 12% and 46% of genetic variation for the nine phenotypes. Lastly, we used two different cross-validation scenarios to show that genomic selection models incorporating subgenome and epistatic effects improve predictive ability by 1%-34% depending on the phenotype and the genomic selection training set.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticFragariaGenome, PlantPolyploidySelection, GeneticGenetic VariationGenotypePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID41684156
PMCPMC12904010

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.