Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684266›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in anaesthesiology2026

Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in obstetric anesthesia: early warning for maternal complications.

Vesela P Kovacheva, Michael L Burns

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vesela P KovachevaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael L BurnsDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Ethical, multimodal AI tool for prediction of preeclampsia risk in early pregnancyOT2OD038029 · OD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Kathryn Johnson Gray, Vesela Kovacheva · 2025 to 2026
$2.2M
Precision medicine approaches to understand and prevent stillbirthR01HD117802 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kathryn Johnson Gray · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
Personalized Postpartum Hemorrhage Prediction Using Machine Learning And Polygenic Risk ScoresK08HL161326 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Vesela Kovacheva · 2022 to 2026
$842k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL161326NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD117802NIH HHS OT2 OD038029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMaternal morbidity and mortality remain largely preventable, yet current risk-assessment tools identify only a fraction of women who experience severe complications. This review synthesizes recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning for early prediction, decision support, and procedural guidance in obstetric anesthesia, with a focus on postpartum hemorrhage, hypertensive disease, sepsis, hemodynamic instability, neuraxial procedures, and peripartum pain. RECENT

findingsRecently, electronic health record (EHR)-integrated and imaging-based machine learning models have outperformed traditional risk scores for postpartum hemorrhage, placenta accreta spectrum, and pre-eclampsia, and are beginning to incorporate multiomics and genetic data. Obstetric-specific early warning systems and parsimonious machine learning models for maternal sepsis and epidural-related fever show promise but remain limited by sensitivity and external validation. Waveform analytics, noninvasive hemodynamic indices, and artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound can anticipate hypotension and enhance neuraxial and regional block placement. Machine learning frameworks for postcesarean and chronic postpartum pain, together with virtual reality interventions, support more individualized analgesia. SUMMARY: Artificial intelligence-enabled tools are poised to augment, rather than replace, clinician judgment in obstetric anesthesia. Real-world impact will depend on rigorous external validation, equitable implementation, interpretable model design, seamless EHR integration, and close collaboration between clinicians, data scientists, and vendors.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ObstetricalArtificial IntelligencePregnancy ComplicationsData AnalyticsFemaleHumansMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPregnancyRisk Assessmentmachine learningmaternal outcomesobstetric anesthesiapredictive analyticspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41684266
PMCPMC13231824

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.