ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026
Disulfidptosis-related genes signature predicts prognosis and immune microenvironment in colon cancer.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disulfidptosis as an immunometabolic rheostat in gastrointestinal cancers: tuning the balance between T Cell exhaustion and immunogenic cell death.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colon cancer (CC), characterized by high incidence and mortality, ranks among the most prevalent digestive malignancies, and reliable molecular tools to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response are needed. Disulfidptosis is a recently identified form of programmed cell death induced by disulfide stress and represents a potential therapeutic target for CC. However, the prognostic and immunological implications of disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) in CC remain underexplored. Methods: RNA sequencing and clinical data from TCGA and GEO databases (GSE39582, GSE17536) were analyzed. A prognostic model including five DRGs (RAB7A, SLC7A11, INF2, FLNA, OXSM) was established using WGCNA, univariate Cox, and LASSO-Cox regression. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on risk scores. The model was cross-validated by Kaplan-Meier, time-dependent ROC, nomogra, and multivariable Cox analyses. Immune infiltration (ssGSEA), tumor-mutation burden, miRNA-DRG networks, and drug-sensitivity correlations (CCLE/GDSC/CellMiner) were assessed. Protein expression of RAB7A and OXSM was further examined in tissue microarrays (TMAs) of 97 CCs with matched normal mucosae using immunohistochemistry. Results: A 5-DRGs prognostic model was established which serves as an independent signal of overall survival and immunotherapy efficacy in CC. Low-risk group patients exhibited an immune-favorable microenvironment and were more abundant with activated CD56 bright NK, γδ-T, and Th17 cells, higher tumor mutational burden (TMB), and elevated CTLA-4 expression, which were likely associated with improved response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). As a risk factor, RAB7A relating to poor prognosis was identified in our study, and was a potential target for therapeutic agents such as PLX4720 and PD-0325901, while OXSM was the opposite. Therefore, this model serves as a translatable framework for the precision management of CC, enabling rational risk stratification and facilitating personalized treatment decisions. Conclusion: The 5-DRGs prognostic model can be used to assess the prognosis of patients with CC, and reflect the characteristics of their immune microenvironment. With RAB7A and OXSM as key determinants, this model provides a clinically applicable framework for risk stratification and personalized treatment guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.