ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2026
A blueprint for integrating nursing informatics into undergraduate nursing programs: A multiple-case study in Australia and South Africa.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop a blueprint based on empirical data to guide the integration of nursing informatics (NI) into undergraduate nursing programs. Methods: This study employed a qualitative, holistic multiple-case study design, allowing each case to be examined as an integrated contextual system. Data were obtained from four cases-two from Australian universities and two from South African universities-all of which were public institutions offering undergraduate nursing programs. Twenty-one academic staff participated. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews, document review, and field observations. The documents reviewed included national digital health strategies, health informatics and NI standards, nursing education policies, accreditation standards, and curriculum guidelines. Materials from institutions-including subject outlines, program handbooks, and teaching policies-were also reviewed to gain a better understanding of how NI was integrated in each case. An individual case analysis employed conventional content analysis, followed by a cross-case thematic comparison. Data collection and analysis were conducted iteratively until saturation was achieved. Results: This study highlighted the need for NI in undergraduate nursing programs. Foundational competencies, such as computer and information literacy, and advanced NI competencies, including digital health literacy, data security, and privacy literacy, alongside other competencies, were identified across varying levels of proficiency. Data from four cases led to the development of a blueprint to guide the integration of NI into undergraduate curricula. It comprises eight context-responsive steps, including situational and training needs analysis, NI competency identification and mapping against national and international standards, NI content development, sequencing NI content and experience, NI content review, implementation, and evaluation. The blueprint promotes responsive curricula that strengthen NI capabilities and readiness for digital healthcare. Conclusion: The blueprint aligns with nursing education priorities, workforce needs, and emerging technologies, thereby supporting NI competency development that advances digitally transformed healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.