Trial reportFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Clinical efficacy observation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with auditory integration training in children with ASD.
Trial report in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has become a major public health issue of global concern and has attracted the attention of researchers in recent years. Due to the high incidence and persistent lifelong dysfunction of children with ASD, exploring active and effective intervention strategies plays a key role in their prognosis. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and auditory integration training (AIT) are both promising neuromodulation methods and play an important role in clinical intervention in children with ASD. This study aims to explore the clinical effectiveness of rTMS and AIT combined intervention compared with single intervention through randomized controlled experiments, and provide scientific basis for clinical intervention in ASD. Methods: A total of 60 participants with ASD were randomly assigned to the study group (rTMS combined with AIT) and the control group (rTMS) in a 1:1 ratio, with 30 participants in each group. The outcome indicators were the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC), the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R). Clinical data were collected at baseline and after intervention. Data were processed and analyzed by SPSS. Results: After 12 weeks of intervention, the total scores of ABC, CARS, SDQ and RBS-R in the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before intervention ( Discussion: The intervention therapy of rTMS combined with AIT has significant efficacy in children with ASD, which can significantly improve the core symptoms and emotional behavioral problems of children with ASD. This method is worthy of being promoted and applied in clinical practice. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=225665, identifier ChiCTR2400082706.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.