ArticleiScience2026
Sensory modality shapes post-learning functional connectivity.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Larg-scale multimodal fMRI dataset of visual and haptic 3D object category learning.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning new categories through different sensory modalities induces distinct forms of neural plasticity that persist in resting-state brain networks. Here, we investigate how tactile versus visual category learning affects resting-state functional connectivity and network topography in 84 participants (41 visual and 43 tactile learners). Using correlation-based connectivity matrices and graph-theoretical analyses, we found that tactile learners exhibited higher network assortativity than visual learners. Local graph features analysis revealed cerebellar involvement in both modalities, while also indicating regional specialization for processing distinct sensory inputs. Significant between-group differences also emerged in the frontal regions, putamen, supramarginal gyrus, and parts of the temporal lobe. Finally, using the Fisher's score method and random forest classifier, we achieved 78.57% accuracy in distinguishing learning groups based on resting-state connectivity patterns. These findings demonstrate that sensory-specific learning creates lasting, modality-dependent imprints on brain network architecture, offering valuable insights into how the brain processes information across different sensory modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.