Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41684883›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026

Risk, precarity, and necropolitics among informal waste workers in peri-urban Islamabad.

Imran Sabir, Abida Sharif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Imran SabirUniversity of Paris Saclay, France.
Abida SharifUniversity of Paris Saclay, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the occupational risks, health precarity and social marginalisation of informal household waste collectors in Bhara Kahu, a rapidly urbanising peri-urban area of Islamabad, and to interpret these risks through contemporary sociological frameworks. Study design: Qualitative case study. Methods: We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 12 informal household waste workers and paired these narratives with targeted field observations in Bhara Kahu. Interviews were conducted in Urdu or Punjabi, recorded with consent, translated and thematically analysed using a reflexive approach informed by an interpretive phenomenological orientation. Interpretation drew on risk society, environmental precarity, structural violence and necropolitics to situate everyday harms within wider political and institutional arrangements. Results: Five interlocking themes emerged. First, workers reported an absence of enforceable labour rights and social protections, with verbal hiring, arbitrary wage deductions and no insurance, earning about PKR 18,000-25,000 per month (approximately 65-90 USD). Second, safety was systemically neglected: there was virtually no training, minimal provision of personal protective equipment and unsafe transport on open rickshaws. Third, untreated injuries and chronic illnesses were common, including lacerations, musculoskeletal pain, persistent cough and skin conditions, with delayed or foregone care due to cost, time pressure and stigma. Fourth, households faced constant hygiene strain, as crowded housing, poor neighbourhood sanitation and limited vaccination amplified exposures beyond the workday. Fifth, social devaluation enabled economic exploitation and job insecurity, normalising humiliation in public interactions and occasionally extending into clinical encounters. Together, these patterns reveal a sanitation regime that purchases urban cleanliness through sacrificial labour. Conclusions: Improving conditions requires formal recognition of informal collectors as a public health workforce, written contracts and social insurance, reliable PPE backed by practical training, routine vaccination and mobile health services, source segregation to reduce hazardous contact, and anti-stigma measures in communities and clinics. Without such changes, risk will continue to be shifted onto those with the least capacity to refuse it.

Indexed as

Informal waste workNecropoliticsOccupational healthPeri-urban governanceStigmaStructural violence

Identifiers

PMID41684883
PMCPMC12890851

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.