ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Risk, precarity, and necropolitics among informal waste workers in peri-urban Islamabad.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Female Scrap Collectors in Qumbu, Eastern Cape, South Africa Through the Lens of Resilience Theory.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the occupational risks, health precarity and social marginalisation of informal household waste collectors in Bhara Kahu, a rapidly urbanising peri-urban area of Islamabad, and to interpret these risks through contemporary sociological frameworks. Study design: Qualitative case study. Methods: We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 12 informal household waste workers and paired these narratives with targeted field observations in Bhara Kahu. Interviews were conducted in Urdu or Punjabi, recorded with consent, translated and thematically analysed using a reflexive approach informed by an interpretive phenomenological orientation. Interpretation drew on risk society, environmental precarity, structural violence and necropolitics to situate everyday harms within wider political and institutional arrangements. Results: Five interlocking themes emerged. First, workers reported an absence of enforceable labour rights and social protections, with verbal hiring, arbitrary wage deductions and no insurance, earning about PKR 18,000-25,000 per month (approximately 65-90 USD). Second, safety was systemically neglected: there was virtually no training, minimal provision of personal protective equipment and unsafe transport on open rickshaws. Third, untreated injuries and chronic illnesses were common, including lacerations, musculoskeletal pain, persistent cough and skin conditions, with delayed or foregone care due to cost, time pressure and stigma. Fourth, households faced constant hygiene strain, as crowded housing, poor neighbourhood sanitation and limited vaccination amplified exposures beyond the workday. Fifth, social devaluation enabled economic exploitation and job insecurity, normalising humiliation in public interactions and occasionally extending into clinical encounters. Together, these patterns reveal a sanitation regime that purchases urban cleanliness through sacrificial labour. Conclusions: Improving conditions requires formal recognition of informal collectors as a public health workforce, written contracts and social insurance, reliable PPE backed by practical training, routine vaccination and mobile health services, source segregation to reduce hazardous contact, and anti-stigma measures in communities and clinics. Without such changes, risk will continue to be shifted onto those with the least capacity to refuse it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.