ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Exploration of the correlation between clinical indicators and prognosis in hospitalized children with pneumonia and construction of a risk prediction model based on machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Childhood pneumonia is a leading cause of hospitalization and death in children under 5 years globally. Its prognosis varies individually and is affected by multiple clinical indicators, while traditional assessment lacks quantitative risk stratification tools. Machine learning (ML) enables comprehensive analysis of high-dimensional clinical data, making it valuable for identifying key prognostic factors and building robust prediction models to optimize clinical decision-making. Methods: A total of 582 hospitalized children (1 month-5 years) with community-acquired pneumonia were retrospectively enrolled (January 2022-June 2025). Demographic, laboratory (WBC, CRP, PCT, LYM%, serum albumin), vital sign, and underlying disease data were collected. Adverse prognosis was defined as a composite of prolonged hospitalization (>7 days), PICU admission, or in-hospital death. Patients were randomly split into training ( Results: Adverse prognosis occurred in 121 (20.8%) children. The XGBoost model outperformed RF and LR, with validation-set AUC 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78∼0.90), accuracy 81.1%, sensitivity 78.6%, and specificity 82.3%. Model calibration was verified via Hosmer-Lemeshow test ( Conclusion: The XGBoost-based model effectively identifies high-risk children with pneumonia, with PCT, CRP, and respiratory rate as key predictors. It provides a practical tool for clinical risk stratification and personalized management. The model's cutoffs for PCT (>2 ng/mL) and CRP (>40 mg/L) align with existing pediatric pneumonia predictive scores (e.g., PRIEST score) but offer improved discriminative power by integrating multi-dimensional indicators and ML-driven interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.