ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Quadriceps Strength and Movement Patterns in Patients After ACLR Who Pass a Clinic-Based Return-to-Sport Testing Battery.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Passing a battery of return to sport (RTS) testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been shown to reduce second injury rates. However, previously reported testing methods are inaccessible for most clinicians due to equipment, financial, and time constraints. Purpose: To assess whether patients after ACLR who pass a clinic-based RTS evaluation have residual strength and/or biomechanical deficits when tested compared with gold standard techniques. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All participants passed a battery of clinic-based RTS tests-including ≥90% limb symmetry during isometric quadriceps strength, 1-repetition maximum isotonic knee extension, and 4 single-legged hop tests (single, crossover, triple, and 6-m timed)-as well as ≥90% on the Global Rating Scale and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form 2000. Laboratory testing then included isometric quadriceps strength and rate of torque development (RTD) (90° of knee flexion) and isokinetic concentric quadriceps and hamstring strength (60 deg/sec) using an isokinetic dynamometer. An 8-camera, 2-force-plate, 3-dimensional motion analysis system was used to measure sagittal-plane joint angles and moments during bilateral and unilateral drop-vertical jumping. Paired Results: In laboratory testing, the peak isometric quadriceps strength was 7.6% lower in the involved limb ( Conclusion: Passing clinic-based RTS testing resulted in laboratory-based strength ≥90% limb symmetry and a previously established target of isometric quadriceps strength of 3 N·m/kg. However, deficits in quadriceps RTD and movement asymmetries persisted despite passing clinical criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.