Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41685122›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Applying traditional and machine learning-based GWAS approaches for marker-trait identification in wheat.

Joel Joshua Milek, Sebastian Michel, Alexander Buchelt, Andreas Holzinger, Eva Maria Molin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joel Joshua MilekUnit Bioresources, Center for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Tulln, Austria.
Sebastian MichelDepartment of Agrobiotechnology, IFA-Tulln, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Tulln, Austria.
Alexander BucheltHuman-Centered AI Lab, Institute of Forest Engineering, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas HolzingerHuman-Centered AI Lab, Institute of Forest Engineering, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria.
Eva Maria MolinUnit Bioresources, Center for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Tulln, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Complex traits arise from polygenic and interactive genomic architectures that are difficult to resolve using traditional genome-wide association study (GWAS) approaches. Machine learning (ML) provides complementary methods capable of capturing non-linear effects, improving signal detection, and enhancing predictive accuracy of marker trait associations (MTAs). Methods: Using a publicly available winter wheat dataset (CIMMYT), we evaluated several widely used traditional GWAS tools, including GAPIT, GCTA, GEMMA, sommer, and TASSEL, with respect to computational efficiency, model performance, and the consistency of detected associations. In parallel, ML approaches, such as Elastic Net, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest, and the hybrid TSLRF model, were assessed based on feature importance metrics and functional annotation of selected markers. Results: Despite a shared reliance on mixed linear models, the traditional GWAS tools exhibited differences in runtime and showed modest but meaningful variability in the number and overlap of MTAs. ML models recovered several associations detected by traditional methods and additionally identified novel markers, potentially reflecting non-linear or epistatic effects. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate that ML can effectively complement traditional GWAS approaches for marker-trait identification in wheat. By extending beyond additive effects, ML broadens the scope of detectable genetic signals, providing a practical way to analyze complex traits and support informed marker-assisted breeding strategies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceGWASplant heightthousand kernel weighttool comparisonTriticum aestivum

Identifiers

PMID41685122
PMCPMC12891156

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.