ReviewHealthcare technology letters
The Effect of Telehealth on Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.
Review in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effect of Telehealth on Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.Healthcare technology lettersReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is a prevalent chronic condition characterised by the gradual deterioration of memory and personal abilities due to nervous system damage, requiring prolonged care and management. In contemporary healthcare, telehealth has gained recognition as an effective approach for managing chronic illnesses by improving equitable access to quality medical services and minimising expenses. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the role of telehealth in enhancing the well-being of patients with Alzheimer's disease and supporting their caregivers, as evidenced by findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This systematic review concentrated on RCTs published in English, with no constraints on publication date. The search process was accomplished on 11 August, 2025, using appropriate keywords across well-established scientific databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and ProQuest. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and only those scoring above seven were included in the analysis. From an initial collection of 1242 articles, 14 trials were ultimately included in this review. Telehealth interventions demonstrated significant improvements in cognitive function, mobility and quality of life among individuals with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's Disease, while also reducing caregiver burden and psychological distress. These interventions, implemented through synchronous and asynchronous delivery methods, were deemed feasible, well-received and associated with strong adherence rates. Nonetheless, limitations such as small sample sizes and restricted access to technological resources emphasise the need for additional research to address these gaps. The findings from 13 out of 14 articles in this systematic review indicate that telehealth interventions, including virtual reality, video conferencing, computerised cognitive training and group movement programs, have the potential to significantly enhance health outcomes and quality of life for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers compared to traditional in-person treatments. These interventions, delivered through diverse and flexible modalities, also demonstrate cost-effectiveness and improved caregiver well-being, reinforcing telehealth as a scalable and effective approach for comprehensive Alzheimer's care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.