Observational studyDiabetologia2026
Exercise in type 1 diabetes: real-world data on glucose levels and hypoglycaemia risk from over 420,000 exercise sessions.
Observational study in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThis large observational cohort real-world study explored the effects of three forms of exercise (walking [WALK], aerobic excluding walking [AER] and anaerobic [ANAER]) on glucose levels and hypoglycaemia risk in type 1 diabetes.
methodsData were collected from 3248 users of mySugr Logbook and Apple Health (mean ± SD age 41.23±12.25 years; glucose management index of 7.05±1.09%; 41.5% were female) over a total of 428,058 exercise sessions. Acute and 24 h glycaemic effects were examined across exercise types. Post-exercise glycaemia data over 24 h were compared with sedentary glycaemic data. Time of exercise was used to assess the probability of nocturnal hypoglycaemia.
resultsIndependent of type, exercise decreased glucose by -1.06±0.89 mmol/l. For the individual types of exercise, WALK decreased levels by -1.24±0.81 mmol/l, AER by -1.43±1.02 mmol/l and ANAER by -0.52±0.81 mmol/l (all p<0.001). Comparing sedentary days vs active days, the time in range (3.9-10 mmol/l glucose) increased by +2.08±6.06% for WALK, +2.94±6.46% for AER and +3.93±7.16% for ANAER, and the time below range (<3.9 mmol/l) increased by 0.37±1.57% for WALK, 0.74±1.70% for AER and 0.68±1.79% for ANAER (all p<0.001). ANAER yielded a smaller chance of acute hypoglycaemia and WALK yielded a smaller chance of nocturnal hypoglycaemia (p<0.001). Activities done after 15:30 hours did not increase the risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia when compared with earlier exercise sessions (+0.9±0.34%; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationAerobic activities decreased glucose more during exercise sessions than anaerobic exercise and yielded larger acute hypoglycaemia risk; anaerobic activities yielded the largest 24 h glycaemic improvements. More-intense exercise resulted in a larger nocturnal hypoglycaemia than walking; exercise timing was not a relevant contributor to nocturnal hypoglycaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.