Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41686580›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2026

Diagnostic value of mNGS in patients with suspected tumor: An observational study.

Haiyan Zhang

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Haiyan ZhangDepartment of General Practice, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen, University Lingnan Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2273-2398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some patients suspected of infection may have potential causes, such as tumors, but conventional examination methods are negative. Copy number variation (CNV) analysis based on metagenomics next generation sequencing (mNGS) can simultaneously detect pathogenic microorganisms and tumors signals. Patients with suspected infection in our department were retrospectively analyzed, and mNGS and chromosomal CNV analysis were performed simultaneously. A total of 9 patients with positive tumor signal were included in the study. This study was divided into 2 parts: in the first part, patients suspected of infection were finally diagnosed with a tumor by CNV assisted analysis; in the second part, the accuracy of this analysis was verified again by patients with a history of cancer. Three of five patients without a history of tumor were diagnosed with hematological malignancy. All patients with active tumor had obvious abnormal CNV signals. The chromosomal abnormalities mainly included multiple chromosome duplication and deletion, arm level duplication and deletion, and chromosome aneuploidy. mNGS-based CNV analysis had clinical value for patients with underlying tumor.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomicsNeoplasmsAdultAgedChromosome AberrationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiescopy number variationhematological malignancymetagenomics Next generation sequencingsuspected infectiontumor signals

Identifiers

PMID41686580
PMCPMC12908843

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.