ArticlePloS one2026
Health-related effects of walking football in older adults: A real-world longitudinal study across a season comparing two age groups.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the health-related effects of a 9-month walking-football (WF) season in already active older adults, comparing participants aged 50-59 and ≥60. The study employed a longitudinal pre-post design conducted in a real-world community setting. The participants were 32 adults aged over 50 (including 2 women) who completed a 9-month, twice-weekly outdoor WF program. Baseline and post-season assessments included body measurements, blood biomarkers, cardiovascular fitness (Bruce protocol), muscle strength (countermovement jump, handgrip strength, and isokinetic measurements), physical activity, and health-related quality of life. Training load was monitored via heart rate and session rating of perceived exertion. Statistical analyses compared pre- and post-season outcomes, as well as differences between age groups (50-59 vs. ≥ 60 years). Anthropometric parameters remained stable over the season, with participants aged 50-59 showing higher weight, BMI, and muscle mass than those aged ≥60 (p < 0.05). Reductions occurred in blood glucose, along with favorable changes in lipid profiles in older participants (p < 0.05), and increased vitamin D (p < 0.05). Creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and adiponectin decreased over the season (p < 0.05). Although the differences were not statistically significant, older adults maintained peak VO₂, whereas younger participants exhibited a small decline. Muscle strength decreased across both age groups, specifically handgrip strength and knee extension (p < 0.001-0.05). Physical activity levels showed a non-significant increase in total and high-intensity METs, especially among younger participants. In conclusion, walking football may help preserve cardiometabolic health, functional capacity, and quality of life in physically active older adults throughout a competitive season. Nevertheless, specific program adjustments-such as higher training loads, the inclusion of strength or resistance components, and age-tailored modifications-could be required to maximize outcomes, particularly among younger participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.