ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Usability and Cultural Relevance of an mHealth App for Hispanic/Latino Individuals Living With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hispanic and Latino individuals represent 14.6% of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cases in the United States and experience significant disparities in access to rheumatologic care, disease management, and health outcomes. Mobile health (mHealth) apps are promising tools to improve patient-provider communication and self-management among populations with language and literacy barriers. However, few RA-focused digital health interventions (DHIs) have been culturally adapted for Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino individuals. Objective: This study aims to assess the health literacy, eHealth literacy, technology trust, and digital self-efficacy of Hispanic and Latino individuals with RA, and to evaluate the cultural relevance, usability, and patient satisfaction of the Spanish-language RunRA app. Additionally, it will explore health care providers' perceptions of the app's usefulness for clinical decision-making and communication with Hispanic and Latino patients. Methods: A prospective, iterative convergent mixed methods design integrated with the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) will be used. We will recruit 25 Hispanic and Latino patients with RA and 7 Spanish-speaking health care professionals. Quantitative data will include standardized questionnaires (SAHL-S, eHEALS, Human-Computer Trust Scale, Digital Self-Efficacy Scale) and app analytics. Qualitative data will be collected via interviews and focus groups using the Cultural Relevance Questionnaire (CRQ), System Usability Scale (SUS), and Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). Data will be analyzed using an independent intramethod strategy, with integration guided by FRAME to inform culturally relevant app modifications. Results: We anticipate enrolling 32 participants (25 patients and 7 providers). This study will be the first to evaluate the cultural relevance and usability of an mHealth app specifically designed for Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino individuals living with RA. Conclusions: Our long-term goal is to assess the potential for the mHealth app to act as a vehicle for the dissemination of accurate, useful, usable, and understandable health information to populations that experience health disparities and their health care providers. Findings will inform iterative refinements to RunRA and contribute to the development of culturally responsive DHIs aimed at improving communication, shared decision-making, and health outcomes in underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.