Evidence mapPaperPMID 41686996Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in hematology2026

Clinical applications of PET imaging for evaluating treatment-induced vascular toxicity in oncology.

Anjana Jayaraman, Mitchel R Stacy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anjana JayaramanCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital.
Mitchel R StacyCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital.

Funding

PET/CT Imaging of Venous Thromboembolism in Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult OncologyR01HL171715 · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · 2025 to 2025
$671k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL171715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewVascular toxicity resulting from cancer and its treatment remains a largely uncharacterized and minimally treated pathology. This review highlights ongoing developments and applications of PET imaging for noninvasive characterization of cancer-associated vascular toxicity and discusses the potential prognostic value of PET imaging for predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cancer. RECENT

findingsNumerous clinical investigations have used PET imaging to evaluate vascular inflammation/toxicity in patients undergoing or completing cancer therapies, including chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and radiation therapy. The most widely utilized PET radionuclide for noninvasively detecting vascular toxicity in clinical oncology has been fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose, which has demonstrated promising associations with disease severity and clinical outcomes. Emerging radionuclides continue to be developed for targeting immune cells and may increase the sensitivity and specificity of PET imaging for detecting vascular toxicity associated with cancers and their treatment. SUMMARY: The use of PET imaging for noninvasive detection and quantification of cancer treatment-associated vascular toxicity continues to evolve and could provide a unique approach for predicting risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in various forms of cancer and treatment.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyHumansRadiotherapyAntineoplastic Agentschemotherapyinflammationnuclear imagingoncologypositron emission tomographyvascular toxicity

Identifiers

PMID41686996
PMCPMC13034751

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.