ArticleCancer research communications2026
Examining the Intersection between Drivers of Disparities: Social Determinants and Stress Reactivity in African American Breast Cancer Survivors.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Responses to social stressors are important drivers of cancer risk and outcomes; however, current studies focus on neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDOH). We evaluated within-subject trajectories in stress reactivity (i.e., change in salivary cortisol) among 60 African American patients with breast cancer and examined the moderating effects of social stressors on cortisol responses. SDOHs were obtained by self-report and were included in linear mixed-effects regression models that were generated for cortisol levels, including time (primary regressor) adjusting for time-invariant covariates. Significant increases in cortisol levels were observed at 12- and 24-minute post-Trier Social Stress Test tasks. Significant interactions between time and SDOHs on cortisol were identified. Higher and escalating stress reactivity was observed in patients with greater financial strain, social isolation, negative life events, and perceived stress. Social risk factors moderated stress reactivity; however, additional research is needed to understand the effects of physiologic stress reactivity on tumor etiology and progression, especially among patients who have greater exposure to social stressors. SIGNIFICANCE: Chronic stress exposure promotes breast cancer initiation and progression; however, current studies focus on neighborhood-level deprivation even though individual variability in stress reactivity is an important driver of cancer risk and outcomes, especially among those who experience the greatest burden of disease. Self-reported data on social risk factors can be used to enhance the precision of cancer care by identifying patients who should be prioritized for referral to socially informed care and who are likely to experience dysregulated cortisol response to SDOHs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.