ArticleBMJ open2026
Latent profiles of frailty in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify distinct latent frailty profiles using latent profile analysis (LPA) in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) and to examine the factors associated with profile membership.
designA cross-sectional study.
settingThis research used data acquired from a major tertiary referral hospital in China.
participantsThis study recruited 391 HNC patients receiving radiotherapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Validated instruments included a demographic questionnaire, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, FRAIL Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Perceived Social Support Scale. Profile membership associations were assessed using χ
resultsThe frailty status of patients can be divided into three different categories: (1) robust group (23.0%), (2) prefrail group (49.6%) and (3) frail group (27.4%). Frailty demonstrated independent associations with nine clinical parameters in adjusted regression models: radiotherapy session frequency, social support, age, CCI score, educational attainment, metastasis, nutritional risk, radiation-induced injuries and serum albumin levels (p<0.05).
conclusionThe distinct frailty profiles identified by LPA can inform the future development of targeted care protocols for specific subgroups (eg, the frail group), with a focus on key predictors such as age and nutritional risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.