Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688574›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026

Dried blood spot-based monitoring of immune and epigenetic biomarkers in occupational exposure studies.

Evi De Ryck, Eva-Maria Hoornaert, Yanthe Buntinx, Eline Verscheure, Michelle C Turner, Anjoeka Pronk, Peter Hm Hoet, Lode Godderis, Manosij Ghosh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Evi De RyckDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eva-Maria Hoornaert *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Yanthe Buntinx *Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eline VerscheureDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Michelle C TurnerBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Anjoeka PronkNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Risk Analysis for Products in Development, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter Hm HoetDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lode GodderisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Manosij GhoshDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. manosij.ghosh@kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-sampling of biomaterials is an important means for continuous remote occupational surveillance. Recently, we presented an overview of different self-sampling methods for occupational research. Dried blood spots (DBS), urine, saliva and oral buccal cells were matrices of choice for rapid, minimally invasive sample collection for analysis of a wide range of biomarkers.

objectiveWe set up pilot studies to optimise a suitable workflow for minimally invasive matrices in different occupational setups.

methodsA two-phase pilot study was conducted. In Phase 1, DBS samples were collected from 40 healthy participants according to written and video-recorded protocols. Samples were received intact and without visible damage. We surveyed participants on aspects related to ease of self-sampling and clarity of instructions. In Phase 2, a study of 15 participants, we further refined the protocols to characterise global DNA methylation, oxidative DNA damage (8-OHdG), and immunoarrays (IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, TNF-α, and CRP) in DBS and dried plasma spots (DPS) and assessed the effect of sample storage duration and shipment (stored immediately, and after one, two, four and six weeks).

resultsDBS samples were used to optimise the DNA extraction protocol, which yielded good-quality DNA. We showed the stability for most of the markers up to six weeks. A large number of immune markers could be detected in DBS- and DPS-derived samples, and proteomics was feasible. SIGNIFICANCE: With this study, we confirmed that minimally invasive techniques for good-quality biological sample collection are available for use in future occupational studies. IMPACT: This study establishes a robust framework for minimally invasive self-sampling in occupational health research, demonstrating the feasibility of dried blood and plasma spots for high-quality analysis of proteomic, immune, and DNA biomarkers. These methods support scalable, remote, and longitudinal biomolecular surveillance across diverse work environments. Evaluating biomarker stability is essential, as room temperature storage can affect data integrity. Our findings confirm robust proteomic profiling, stable DNA methylation markers, and promising immune marker detection, reinforcing the potential of dried blood spots for reliable long-term health monitoring.

Indexed as

Dried Blood Spot TestingOccupational ExposureAdultBiomarkersCytokinesDNA DamageDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSalivaSpecimen HandlingBiomarkersCytokinesHealth studiesStudy designsWorkplace exposures

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.