Evidence mapPaperPMID 41688607Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

Sex and gender differences in responses to antianemic therapies: biological mechanisms and clinical implications.

Abbas S Neamah, Fadhel M Lafta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abbas S NeamahDepartment of Biology, College of Sciences, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. Abbas.Saad2102@sc.uobaghdad.edu.iq.
Fadhel M LaftaBranch of Medical and Biological Applications, Institute of Laser for Postgraduate Studies, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anemia is a global health problem with diverse etiologies and significant impacts on morbidity and mortality. Despite the widespread use of antianemic drugs, therapeutic outcomes vary considerably between male and female. Biological sex and gender roles influence anemia risk, symptom presentation, drug metabolism, tolerability, and response, yet these dimensions are often underexplored in clinical practice and research. This review was undertaken to synthesize current knowledge on sex- and gender-specific differences in anemia and antianemic therapy. The rationale lies in the growing recognition that precision medicine requires integration of sex and gender into pharmacological and clinical frameworks, moving beyond uniform treatment strategies. The review demonstrates that sex hormones, baseline physiology, and gendered behaviors collectively shape anemia risk and therapeutic trajectories. Females often present earlier with symptoms, experience higher rates of adverse drug reactions (ADR), and respond differently to iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy, while males show delayed symptom recognition, require higher ESA doses, and underreport side effects. Drug metabolism stages-absorption, distribution, and elimination-also diverge via sex, influencing exposure and efficacy. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of sex- and gender-specific differences in anemia and antianemic therapy. The rationale for this work is to inform clinicians, researchers, and policymakers that integrating sex and gender into diagnostic thresholds, dosing strategies, monitoring protocols, and patient counseling is essential to optimize outcomes, reduce adverse events, and advance equity in anemia management.

Indexed as

AnemiaHematinicsAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsTreatment Effect HeterogeneityHematinicsAnemiaAntianemic drugsDrug metabolismGender disparitiesSex differences

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.