ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Sex and gender differences in responses to antianemic therapies: biological mechanisms and clinical implications.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anemia is a global health problem with diverse etiologies and significant impacts on morbidity and mortality. Despite the widespread use of antianemic drugs, therapeutic outcomes vary considerably between male and female. Biological sex and gender roles influence anemia risk, symptom presentation, drug metabolism, tolerability, and response, yet these dimensions are often underexplored in clinical practice and research. This review was undertaken to synthesize current knowledge on sex- and gender-specific differences in anemia and antianemic therapy. The rationale lies in the growing recognition that precision medicine requires integration of sex and gender into pharmacological and clinical frameworks, moving beyond uniform treatment strategies. The review demonstrates that sex hormones, baseline physiology, and gendered behaviors collectively shape anemia risk and therapeutic trajectories. Females often present earlier with symptoms, experience higher rates of adverse drug reactions (ADR), and respond differently to iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy, while males show delayed symptom recognition, require higher ESA doses, and underreport side effects. Drug metabolism stages-absorption, distribution, and elimination-also diverge via sex, influencing exposure and efficacy. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of sex- and gender-specific differences in anemia and antianemic therapy. The rationale for this work is to inform clinicians, researchers, and policymakers that integrating sex and gender into diagnostic thresholds, dosing strategies, monitoring protocols, and patient counseling is essential to optimize outcomes, reduce adverse events, and advance equity in anemia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41688607What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.