ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Management perceptions on oral health policies in nursing homes using the interRAI instrument: a SWOT analysis.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal associations between oral and general health indicators among nursing home residents: an open cohort study based on interRAI assessments.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImproving poor oral health among nursing home residents requires a multi-level approach, including effective organizational oral health policies. The interRAI instrument for holistic care needs assessments supports policy development and enables identification and management of oral care needs by integrating the validated Oral Health Screener (OHS). This study explored the perceptions of nursing home staff, involved in policy development or implementation, on oral health policies in Flemish (Belgian) and Dutch nursing homes, and on experiences using the current oral health section or OHS in the interRAI instrument.
methodsBetween May-November 2024, seven online focus groups (34 participants) and four interviews (five participants) were organized across 26 Flemish and four Dutch nursing homes, respectively. Participants were grouped based on nursing home characteristics, with a maximum of three participants per home. Semi-structured questions addressed perceptions on oral care guidelines, resources, collaborations, practices, and oral health assessments. Transcripts were coded in NVivo and analyzed using a SWOT framework to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in current policies, while experiences using the current oral health section and the OHS were explored separately.
resultsStrengths included using the OHS in multidisciplinary consultations and oral care working groups. Common weaknesses were limited collaboration with oral health professionals and inconsistent oral health policies. Opportunities included enhancing interprofessional collaboration and involving dental hygienists. Threats included limited attention to oral health in caregivers' education and staff shortages. Differences were observed between Flemish and Dutch nursing homes, and a lack of standardization among Flemish ones.
conclusionsThis study identified areas for improvement in nursing homes' oral health policies. Consistent, comprehensive policies can address care gaps and improve integration of oral care into daily practice, contributing to better resident health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.