ArticlemAbs2026
ASD: antigen-specific antibody database.
Article in mAbs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond affinity: AI-supported developability assessment and multi-objective optimization in antibody development.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of computational models addressing therapeutic antibodies faces significant challenges. Particularly, the prediction of binding affinity across a diverse set of measurements, due to the scarcity of data. A critical data element is the set of antibody-antigen interaction pairs associated with sequences. To address this issue, we developed the Antigen Specific Antibody Database (ASD, https://naturalantibody.com/agab/), a database aggregating antibody-antigen interaction data from multiple studies with standardized formatting and annotations. Our dataset compilation strategy resulted in data from 15 distinct sources, resulting in 1,097,946 unique antibody-antigen interactions (with 9575 unique antigens). The ASD captures diverse affinity measures and qualitative binding assessment, along with metadata including UniProt and PDB identifiers, target protein names, confidence levels, and experimental conditions such as type of measured affinity, source organism, and germline genes. Through this integration drive, we make available an ample resource of interaction data gathered from the public domain to act as a foundation for model development and further data generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.