ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2026
Modern resources for intrinsic disorder predictions: protein language models, deep learning, meta-servers, and databases.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the structure-function paradigm: A comprehensive review of intrinsically disordered proteins.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational prediction of intrinsic disorder in protein sequences is an impactful and growing research area, recently infused with deep learning and protein language models, prompting the need to assess the impact of these advancements. We systematically surveyed 128 disorder predictors, many of which are accurate, and some that have been cited thousands of times. We demonstrated that recent methods utilizing protein language models outperform those that do not, particularly when combined with deep learning, yielding substantial gains in predictive quality. We place these observations within the context of other key factors, including runtime and coverage. We also identified and discussed resources that expedite and ease the collection of disorder predictions, including meta-web servers and large databases of pre-computed disorder predictions. Altogether, this work guides users in their pursuit of efficiently and conveniently obtaining accurate disorder predictions and offers practical insights for the developers of disorder predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.