Evidence mapPaperPMID 41689628Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2026

Modern resources for intrinsic disorder predictions: protein language models, deep learning, meta-servers, and databases.

Kui Wang, Gang Hu, Jing Yu, Lukasz Kurgan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kui WangNITFID, School of Statistics and Data Science, AAIS, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Gang HuNITFID, School of Statistics and Data Science, AAIS, LPMC and KLMDASR, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Jing YuDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Lukasz KurganDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. lkurgan@vcu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7749-0314

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 12326611National Natural Science Foundation of China 92370128National Science Foundation 2125218National Science Foundation 2146027Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Program 24ZXZSSS00320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational prediction of intrinsic disorder in protein sequences is an impactful and growing research area, recently infused with deep learning and protein language models, prompting the need to assess the impact of these advancements. We systematically surveyed 128 disorder predictors, many of which are accurate, and some that have been cited thousands of times. We demonstrated that recent methods utilizing protein language models outperform those that do not, particularly when combined with deep learning, yielding substantial gains in predictive quality. We place these observations within the context of other key factors, including runtime and coverage. We also identified and discussed resources that expedite and ease the collection of disorder predictions, including meta-web servers and large databases of pre-computed disorder predictions. Altogether, this work guides users in their pursuit of efficiently and conveniently obtaining accurate disorder predictions and offers practical insights for the developers of disorder predictors.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDatabases, ProteinDeep LearningIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsDeep learningIntrinsically disordered proteinsIntrinsic disorderPredictionProtein functionProtein language model

Identifiers

PMID41689628
PMCPMC12913823

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.