ArticleNeurobiology of aging2026
Gender-related facilitators and barriers to participation in research on aging using fuzzy cognitive mapping.
Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the context of cognitive neuroscience research on aging, older women are often overrepresented in observational research, whereas men are overrepresented in clinical trials. Factors underlying the selection bias between and across genders in research on aging are currently poorly understood. Addressing this knowledge gap is critical to provide guidance on how we might mitigate selection bias and improve the generalizability, robustness, and reproducibility of our findings. We aimed to identify the barriers and facilitating factors that older adults perceive when considering participation in cognitive neuroscience research that were shared across, or that differed between, older women and men. We employed fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM), a method that facilitates participation in research and action. Maps were co-created individually with research participants to identify factors, and their inter-relationships, that encouraged or hindered their participation in research. These factors were then standardized across maps, categorized through thematic analysis, and organized into group-level causal networks using graph theory methods. Our results indicated that both older women and men perceived individual psychological motivators, the quality of communication with the research team, logistic considerations and research-specific practices as key factors that influenced their participation in research. Dissociable factors between genders were also identified: Prior personal and professional experiences facilitated research engagement in women, whereas willingness to return benefits to the general population encouraged men's research participation. These findings provide insights to guide the development of sampling strategies that enable equitable access to research and enhanced sample representativeness among women and men in research on aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.