ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026
Developing an interpretable machine learning model via SHAP to predict HCC postoperative survival based on tumor immune microenvironment CODEX immunomics and MRI.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBy generating an immune score reflecting the tumor immune microenvironment via Co-detection by Indexing (CODEX) Immunomics and integrating clinicoradiological features, we developed an interpretable machine learning model to predict postoperative survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 94 HCC patients who underwent the CODEX procedure and had preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were divided into a training set (n = 65) and a validation set (n = 29) in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified clinicoradiological independent risk factors for 5-year survival to construct the Clinical model. For immunomics analysis, 36 immune-related molecules were evaluated using CODEX. Key features were selected through univariate Cox regression and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE). The best-performing classifier among five machine learning algorithms was used to build the Immune model. The immune score from the Immune model and variables from the Clinical model were combined using multivariate Cox regression to identify independent risk factors, forming the Clinical-Immune model. Models were compared for discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. SHAP was used to interpret the model’s predictions.
resultShape, arterial peritumoral enhancement, intratumoral necrosis constituted the Clinical model. Five immunomics features formed the Immune model using a survival decision algorithm. The Clinical-Immune model combined the immune score and arterial peritumoral enhancement. The concordance indexes (C-indexes) for the three models were 0.730, 0.832, and 0.852 in the training set, and 0.624, 0.815, and 0.870 in the validation set. Time-dependent area under the curve (timeAUC) values were 0.833, 0.907, and 0.969 in the training set, and 0.656, 0.919, and 1.000 in the validation set. The Clinical-Immune model, which demonstrated the best performance and offered superior predictive consistency and clinical utility, was selected as the final prediction model.
conclusionWe developed an interpretable machine learning model to predict postoperative survival in HCC patients using CODEX immunomics and clinicoradiological features. This robust model enhances survival prediction and supports clinical decision-making in HCC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.