ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Plasma ATN biomarkers across the alzheimer's disease continuum in a Chilean community- and clinic-based cohort.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlasma biomarkers have emerged as robust indicators of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, offering accessible tools for staging and stratification. However, their expression across globally diverse populations remains poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the combination of plasma biomarkers could distinguish different stages along the AD continuum and assess their clinical associations in a Latin American cohort.
methodsWe evaluated plasma amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (ATN) biomarkers in 318 older adults from a Chilean community- and clinic-based cohort, including individuals with subjective cognitive complaints (SCC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer’s disease dementia (ADD), alongside cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants. Plasma ATN biomarkers (Aβ42/Aβ40, p-tau217, NfL, and GFAP) were quantified using Simoa technology. Global cognition was assessed with the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE), memory with the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), and functional ability with the Technology–Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (T-ADLQ). Group differences in plasma biomarkers were examined using ANCOVA models adjusted for age, sex, and education, and associations with cognitive performance were evaluated through linear regression analyses. In addition, supervised machine-learning models were implemented to classify participants across diagnostic categories based on plasma biomarker profiles, using cross-validation to evaluate predictive performance.
resultsWe observed a progressive decline in the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and elevations in p-tau217 and GFAP across the clinical continuum. Additionally, p-tau217 and NfL levels were inversely associated with cognitive, memory, and functional performance. Notably, p-tau217 distinguished ADD from CU with high accuracy (AUC = 0.88), although its performance in earlier stages was limited.
conclusionThese findings support the biological consistency of plasma biomarkers in AD-related neurodegeneration and provide novel evidence from a Latin American population. Further studies are needed to improve early-stage detection and to better understand how genetic, environmental, and health factors shape biomarker expressions in underrepresented regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.