Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41692145›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2026

Associations Between State Alcohol Policy Environment and Infant and Maternal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Sarah C M Roberts, Alex Schulte, Goudong Liu, Meenakshi S Subbaraman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah C M RobertsDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California. Electronic address: sarah.roberts@ucsf.edu.
Alex SchulteDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California.
Goudong LiuDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Meenakshi S SubbaramanBehavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California.

Funding

Alcohol and pregnancy: do state-level punitive and supportive policies matter?R01AA023267 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROBERTS, SARAH C.M. · 2015 to 2025
$3.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Alcohol Policy Scale, a measure of the broader alcohol policy environment in the U.S., consistently relates to improved health outcomes. Whether the Alcohol Policy Scale identifies policy environments that might reduce adverse effects from drinking during pregnancy is unknown.

methodsAlcohol Policy Scale total composite score and Alcohol Policy Scale consumption-oriented and Alcohol Policy Scale driving-oriented subscale data were combined with outcome data from birth certificates and commercial insurance claims to examine the associations between the Alcohol Policy Scale and infant and maternal outcomes from 2000 to 2019. Outcomes included birth outcomes (birthweight, low birthweight, gestation, preterm birth), infant outcomes (infant morbidities related to maternal alcohol consumption, infant injuries consistent with maltreatment), and severe maternal morbidities. Analyses were conducted in 2024-2025 and used linear and logistic regression with individual- and state-level controls, state- and year-fixed effects, state-specific time trends, and SEs clustered by state.

resultsThe Alcohol Policy Scale was associated only with birthweight. As the Alcohol Policy Scale indicated stricter policy environments, birthweight decreased (coefficient= -0.45, 95% CI= -0.84, -0.05). The consumption subscale was associated only with severe maternal morbidities; as the subscale indicated stricter environments, odds of severe maternal morbidities increased (AOR=1.03, 95% CI=1.00, 1.06). The driving subscale was associated only with birthweight and infant injuries; as the subscale indicated stricter environments, birthweight decreased (coefficient= -0.14, 95% CI= -0.26, -0.01) as did the odds of infant injuries (AOR=0.99, 95% CI=0.97, 1.00). All findings were no longer statistically significant in 1 or more sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsThe Alcohol Policy Scale does not appear relevant for identifying alcohol policy environments that might reduce adverse effects from drinking during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingHealth PolicyPregnancy OutcomeAdultBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41692145
PMCPMC13432456

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.