ArticleBMJ global health2026
A research agenda for digital payments of health workers in large-scale health campaigns in sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digitising payments for campaign health workers in Africa: the promise and the path to sustainable scale.BMJ global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDigital payments are increasingly favoured over cash for remunerating healthcare workers in large-scale health campaigns due to perceived advantages in efficiency and security. However, evidence to guide their scaling and optimisation is limited. This study aimed to identify and prioritise a global research agenda for digital payments in health campaigns in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).
methodsWe employed the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative methodology. In stage 1, we defined the context and criteria (answerability, feasibility, sustainability/equity, impact). In stage 2, 420 stakeholders were engaged via an online survey, generating 450 research questions, which were refined to a final pool of 35. In stage 3, these 35 questions were scored by 63 experts against the predefined criteria. Research Priority Scores (RPS) and Average Expert Agreement (AEA) were computed for ranking in stage 4.
resultsThe overall RPS for the 35 questions ranged from 38.6% to 6.0% (mean 28.2%, SD 6.4%). The AEA ranged from 67.2% to 82.7% (mean 77%, SD 3.4%), indicating strong consensus. RPS and AEA showed a strong positive correlation (r=0.989, p<0.01). The top-ranked research questions were: (1) Minimum requirements for health systems to digitise payments responsibly (RPS 38.6%); (2) Optimisation of digital payments to enhance campaign effectiveness in SSA (RPS 36.8%); (3) Incentives for digital payment adoption in the healthcare sector (RPS 36.1%); (4) Cost-benefit analysis of digital payments vs cash (RPS 36.3%) and (5) Coverage of mobile money agents and its impact on uptake and satisfaction (RPS 34.0%).
conclusionsThis study provides an expert-consensus roadmap for research on digital payments in health campaigns. Addressing these priorities will generate critical evidence to develop robust, equitable and effective digital payment systems, ultimately strengthening health systems and improving health outcomes in SSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.