ArticleBMJ open2026
Construction of an emergency nursing-sensitive quality indicator system for patients with severe trauma: a modified Delphi study in the Chinese context.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Nursing Quality Evaluation Indicator System for Lung Cancer in Traditional Chinese Medicine Based on the Donabedian Model: A Delphi Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Beyond GCP: developing a differentiated competency framework for principal investigators in innovative drug clinical trials in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of the study was to develop a nursing-sensitive quality indicator system for emergency care of patients with severe trauma, providing a scientific measurement tool for evaluating the quality of emergency trauma nursing.
designA modified Delphi study.
participantsExperts working in emergency surgery or trauma surgery departments were recruited. First, initial nursing-sensitive quality indicators were derived from an analysis and synthesis of existing evidence and semistructured interviews with 12 clinical experts. Subsequently, two-round expert consultations were conducted with 15 experts from various regions of China to refine and finalise the indicators. Finally, the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights of each indicator.
resultsThe valid response rates of questionnaires in the two rounds of expert consultation reached 88.89% and 93.75%, respectively, and the expert authority coefficients were 0.856 and 0.880. The experts ultimately reached a consensus, establishing a nursing-sensitive quality indicator system for emergency care of patients with severe trauma, comprising 3 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators and 49 third-level indicators.
conclusionsThis study provides a tool for the assessment of emergency nursing service quality for patients with severe trauma, establishing a scientific and effective nursing-sensitive quality indicator system to evaluate and improve the quality of nursing services provided by emergency nurses to patients with severe trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.