ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Predictors of Protein Evolution in the drosophilid Immune System.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evolutionary dynamics of immune genes are shaped by diverse selective pressures, yet the relative roles of gene-level traits, functional specialization, and pathway context remain poorly understood. Here, we applied a meta-analytic mixed model approach to quantify how immune-pathway genes differ from other genes in their relative rate of protein sequence divergence (dN/dS), evidence for positive selection, and gene turnover rate (λ). We do this while simultaneously accounting for gene length, expression level, genetic and protein-protein interactions, and structural features such as relative solvent accessibility (RSA). In general, rates of sequence evolution were strongly and positively associated with RSA, and negatively associated with gene length, expression, and the number of genetic/protein-protein interactions, whereas gene turnover rate was largely unaffected by these factors. We find immune genes evolved significantly faster at the protein sequence level than nonimmune genes but, contrary to our expectation, exhibited lower gene turnover rates. Functional and pathway-level analyses revealed accelerated protein evolution in effectors, receptors, and antiviral genes, with the cGAS-STING and Toll pathways showing the highest dN/dS. Gene turnover rate was elevated only in effectors, whereas cellular defense genes were particularly conserved. We also found evidence for an elevated proportion of sites under episodic positive selection in immune genes, particularly in effectors, indicating ongoing adaptive diversification. These findings highlight how immune diversification in Drosophilidae arises from multiple, partly independent, evolutionary axes, shaped jointly by structural constraints, functional roles, and lineage-specific pathogen pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.