Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693243›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2026

The Tap-to-Safety Task: A Novel fMRI Paradigm Assessing Repetitive Threat-Neutralization.

Hannah Berg, Riley Rozniarek, Aardron Robinson, Rayus Kuplicki, Annette Rostel, Nate Mungunkhet, Ryan Smith, H Blair Simpson, Martin P Paulus, Robin L Aupperle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hannah BergLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Riley RozniarekLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Aardron RobinsonLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Rayus KuplickiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Annette RostelLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Nate MungunkhetLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Ryan SmithLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
H Blair SimpsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Robin L AupperleLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Funding

The Center for Neuroscience-based Mental Health Assessment and Prediction (NEUROMAP)P20GM121312 · NIGMS · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI Maëlle Camille Marie Gueguen · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
Laureate Institute for Brain ResearchNIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing experimental threat-related paradigms focus primarily on active or passive avoidance behavior, but do not model the common behavioral pattern of repetitive, effortful actions aimed at neutralizing perceived threats. Here, we describe and provide initial validation for the Tap-to-Safety (TTS) Task, a novel human paradigm designed to experimentally elicit repetitive threat-neutralization behavior during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Adult participants completed the TTS Task; one sample completed the task online and an additional sample completed the task in person, with a subsample completing fMRI. Task stimuli included a threat cue (CS+) paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US), safety cues (CS-) never paired with the US, and safe generalization stimuli (GSs) varying in similarity to the CS+. During an extinction phase, the CS+ was no longer paired with the US. Trials included passive viewing trials, without a neutralization option; and choice trials, in which participants could tap a button repeatedly to gain protection from the US (i.e., repetitive threat-neutralization) while reducing accumulation of reward points. Linear mixed-effects models (LMEs) were used to assess behavioral and neural responses. For fMRI analyses in a subset of participants, a priori regions of interest (ROIs) were used with Bonferroni correction. In-person results (n = 49) demonstrated increased threat expectancy, anxiety, and repetitive threat-neutralization behavior that were higher to the threat cue than to safety cues (ps < 0.001, η

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningBrainBrain MappingConditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalFearMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultanxietyavoidancedecision‐makingfear conditioningfMRIOCDthreat

Identifiers

PMID41693243
PMCPMC12907521

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.