SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2026
The incidence of chronic drug-induced liver injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a recognized adverse drug event. Although most cases present with acute hepatic damage, evidence indicates that a proportion progress to persistent liver injury. The absence of a standardized definition for chronic DILI has contributed to significant discrepancies in reported incidence rates across clinical studies. This meta-analysis aims to determine the pooled incidence of chronic DILI, providing robust epidemiological evidence. Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from their respective inception dates to 11 July 2025. The quality of cohort studies was assessed using the NOS. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled incidence of chronic DILI, expressed as corresponding 95% confidence intervals ( Results: A total of 24 studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled incidence of chronic DILI (based on a duration of liver injury lasting more than 6 months without distinguishing the suspected drugs) was 14.09% (95% Conclusion: Chronic DILI accounts for a clinically certain proportion of DILI cases. Greater emphasis should be placed on the long-term management and follow-up of patients with DILI to mitigate the risk of chronic progression. Systematic Review Registration: https://inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY202580021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.