ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Trance states during a mind-body intervention monitored by BIS.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Within-subject and between-subject variability in responses to a mind-body intervention in electrophysiological brain activity.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mind-body interventions are increasingly used in health care, both for physical and for psychological therapy. With directing the focus to the body and inner experiences they include elements of trance induction and hypnosis. The scope of this experimental study was to test the hypothesis that a non-ordinary state of consciousness may occur during a mind-body intervention with changes in electrical brain activity similar to a hypnotic induction. Methods: Bispectral Index an EEG-derived parameter used in anesthesia, was monitored during a test of hypnotic susceptibility including a trance induction, and during a mind-body intervention modified from the Feldenkrais method. 54 adult volunteers were tested with a short version of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility (HGSHS-5) and the instructions for a mind-body intervention from a 30-min audio file. The latter consists of an introduction, reflections on posture and sensations, and four suggested tasks with body movements and variations followed by a break each time. Contributing factors, namely age, sex, suggestibility and daytime, were analyzed by multifactorial analysis and linear regression. Results: BIS significantly decreased from an awake value of 97.5 to values of 88-92, similar in extent to the hypnosis induction of the test for HGSHS-5. Besides a general decline with duration significant drops were observed with every break. None of the tested potential influencing factors had significant impact. Conclusion: Measurable changes in electrophysical brain activity can be detected during a mind-body intervention as a surrogate marker of a state of non-ordinary consciousness. The high relevance arises from the fact that inclusion of the unconscious is essential for initiating beneficial changes in psychological and physical patterns, as these patterns are encoded and maintained there. The EEG reactions and aspects of a focus shift toward inside, body scan and confusion bring it close to hypnotic trance and provide new and objective research approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.