ArticleJournal of family & community medicine
Factors that contribute to non-urgent utilization of emergency services in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.
Article in Journal of family & community medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe utilization of the Emergency Department (ED) for non-urgent care poses a major problem to the healthcare system. The objective of the study was to assess non-urgent visits to ED and determine the factors influencing non-urgent visits to the ED. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at a secondary level hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia from October 2024 to February 2025. Study included 412 Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) IV and V patients. Data was collected by interviewing the patients or their relative using a validated structured questionnaire. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 29; categorical data was presented as frequencies and percentages. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, was used to determine association between non-urgent ED visit and various factors. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of non-urgent ED visits.
resultsMajority of the patients were Saudis (85.0%), more than half (55.8%) were female, and more than one-third (38.1%) were aged 20-34 years. Common presenting complaints included abdominal pain (20.9%), cold/flu symptoms (10.4%), and back/leg pain (8.7%); Most patients (46.8%) reported symptoms lasting <1 week. At univariate analysis, non-urgent ED visits were significantly associated with age (P = 0.049) and region of residence (P = 0.018). Logistic regression showed weak association between non-urgent ED visit and marital status, employment, type of accommodation, and presence of a chronic disease but these were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Accessibility (43.4%) and perceived urgency (41.0%) were key drivers for the preference of the ED to primary care.
conclusionThe study highlights key factors that influence non-urgent visits, with accessibility and perceived urgency being the primary drivers. Findings highlight the need to improve primary healthcare access and triage awareness to reduce unnecessary ED visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.