ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2026
Endoscopic ultrasound in early gastric cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and Tis/T1a lesion over staging risks.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate T-staging of early gastric cancer (EGC) is critical for selecting the most appropriate treatment strategy. Although the reported diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in determining T stage varies among studies, it continues to serve as an important tool in the pretreatment assessment of EGC.
aimTo identify clinicopathological factors that affect the diagnostic accuracy of EUS in EGC, with particular emphasis on mucosal lesions (Tis/T1a).
methodsWe included EGC patients who underwent endoscopic resection or gastrectomy. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS was assessed by comparing its T-stage evaluation with the histopathological results of the resected specimens. Additionally, potential risk factors associated with the over staging of Tis/T1a lesions by EUS were investigated.
resultsA total of 209 patients were included in this study. The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS for T staging was 74.64%. However, the sensitivity of EUS in identifying Tis/T1a gastric cancers was relatively low at 41.25%. Risk factor analysis showed that younger age (
conclusionThe accuracy of EUS for staging Tis/T1a early gastric cancer is markedly reduced when gastric ulceration is present. Therefore, EUS-based staging should be interpreted cautiously in patients with ulcer-related lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.