ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Traditional Chinese medicine-based visual assessment of tongue features associated with current cancer vs. no cancer history: a matched case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer survivorship is increasing, and many people living with and beyond cancer seek supportive care such as Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), where tongue inspection is routinely used. This exploratory study examined whether visually assessed tongue features differ between cancer survivors and those without a self-reported history of cancer. Methods: Matched case-control ( Results: Six features were found to be associated with cancer presence with an FDR of Conclusion: Selected tongue features, particularly spider sublingual veins and tooth marks, were associated with current cancer in exploratory analyses. However, discrimination was modest, and inter-rater reliability varied across features. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and do not support diagnostic utility. Standardized definitions, rater training, and external validation in larger prospective, multi-center cohorts are required before clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.