ArticleWellcome open research2025
An oropharyngeal gonorrhoea controlled human infection model: a provisional protocol using a novel
Article in Wellcome open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Perspective on the pathogenic Neisseria: milestones, challenges, and future directions.NPJ vaccines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Gonorrhoea is a sexually transmissable infection caused by Methods and analysis: This dose-escalation CHIM study will enrol 20-35 healthy adult volunteers aged 18 to 50 years who were assigned male at birth and only have sex with people assigned male at birth. The primary objectives are to determine i) the safety and tolerability of an oropharyngeal gonorrhoea CHIM; and, ii) the minimum infectious dose of isolate AUSMDU00053933 required for 60-80% of participants to develop oropharyngeal Ethics and dissemination: After scientific peer review of this provisional protocol, a detailed protocol will be submitted for human research ethics committee assessment. Protocol development was informed by feedback from community engagement. Study findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific meetings, with summaries provided to relevant stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.