ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Radiation exposure and clinical validation of autosegmentation models for the supraventricular cardiac conduction system in breast cancer radiotherapy: an institutional perspective.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiation dose to cardiac conduction nodes may contribute to arrhythmia risks in breast cancer (BC) patients after radiotherapy, yet dosimetric evidence remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate doses to the sinoatrial (SAN) and atrioventricular nodes (AVN) in BC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to clinically validate a deep learning-based autosegmentation model for these structures. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 87 BC patients who underwent IMRT. Doses to the whole heart, four cardiac chambers, the SAN, and the AVN were evaluated and correlated. For autosegmentation, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained on 60 patients, validated on seven, and tested on 20. Segmentation accuracy was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and dosimetric consistency was compared between automated and manual contours. Results: In right-sided BC patients, the SAN received the highest mean dose among cardiac substructures (5.43 Gray [Gy]) under a mean heart dose of 3.39 Gy. Both SAN and AVN doses showed strong correlations with right atrial (RA) dose ( Conclusions: The SAN receives substantial irradiation in right-sided BC patients during IMRT, and RA dose strongly correlates with conduction node doses, suggesting its potential as a clinical surrogate. The CNN-based autosegmentation method enables accurate and efficient delineation of the SAN and AVN, facilitating reliable dosimetric assessment in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.