Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41697271›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2026

Intracortical inhibition, corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation in people with and without patellofemoral pain.

Fawei Deng, Manali Akre, Aleksandra Birn-Jeffery, Nelson Cortes, Jamie Tallent, Emily Finch, Xuerong Shao, Bernard Xian Wei Liew, Jia Han, Bradley Stephen Neal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fawei DengSchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8849-568X
Manali AkreSchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Aleksandra Birn-JefferySchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Nelson CortesSchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Jamie TallentSchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Emily FinchSchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Xuerong ShaoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bernard Xian Wei LiewSchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Jia HanCollege of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Bradley Stephen NealSchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

Funding

University of Essex Chancellor's PhD Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the intra-rater reliability of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in people with and without patellofemoral pain (PFP) and to compare nervous system function between these groups, using a case-control design. We sought people with and without PFP to participate in PNS and TMS testing to calculate maximal compound motor action potential, maximal force, voluntary activation (VA), active motor threshold (AMT), corticospinal excitability (CSE), silent period, and short-interval intracortical inhibition. People with PFP also rated their current pain and function. Single-measure intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals were used to determine intra-rater reliability, with standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change calculated. Between-group differences in PNS and TMS variables were determined using Student's two-tailed, independent samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests. Twenty-seven people without and 23 people with PFP completed PNS and TMS testing. For intra-rater reliability, 18 people without and 17 people with PFP returned for a second testing session, and intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from good to excellent (0.62-0.96). People with PFP demonstrated significantly lower VA (P < 0.0001), higher AMT (P = 0.014) and lower CSE (P = 0.018). In conclusion, both PNS and TMS demonstrate acceptable intra-rater reliability in people with and without PFP. Elevated AMT and reduced CSE indicate that people with PFP might have a hypoexcitable motor cortex-corticospinal pathway, and lower VA indicates reduced recruitment of high-threshold motor units. These findings indicate that a neurophysiological mechanism might underpin the poor prognosis of PFP.

Indexed as

Motor CortexNeural InhibitionPatellofemoral Pain SyndromePyramidal TractsAdultCase-Control StudiesElectric StimulationElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultpatellofemoral painprognosisreliability

Identifiers

PMID41697271
PMCPMC13140671

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.