ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2026
Tracking DNA damage localization and chromatin remodeling in live cells using time-resolved quantitative analysis of DNA counterstains.
Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA damage profoundly impacts genome stability and cellular homeostasis, and its repair is tightly coordinated with local chromatin remodeling. However, monitoring these rapid chromatin changes in living cells remains challenging. We recently developed QUANDO, an imaging-based method that exploits a simple DNA counterstain to investigate the subnuclear localization of DNA damage in fixed cells. Here, we adapt this approach to track chromatin remodeling at DNA damage sites in live cells using Hoechst-based staining. Specifically, PARP1-expressing HeLa cells are exposed to UV laser micro-irradiation in a defined nuclear region, and chromatin dynamics are monitored in real time. As expected, PARP1 rapidly accumulates at damage sites, but this response is markedly suppressed upon treatment with Talazoparib, a potent PARP inhibitor. We further observe that laser-induced DNA damage initially localizes to high-density chromatin regions, followed by rapid chromatin relaxation, as indicated by decreasing Hoechst intensity and coefficient of variation (CV). This relaxation is significantly impaired by Talazoparib, consistent with PARP1-dependent chromatin remodeling. Finally, Hoechst-only imaging provides comparable results in both transfected and non-transfected cells, underscoring the robustness of the method and its compatibility with single-label/single-channel acquisition. Chromatin relaxation kinetics were similar in transfected and non-transfected cells, confirming that staining with Hoechst is sufficient for studying chromatin dynamics bypassing the complexities of transfection. These findings underscore the dynamic interplay between DNA damage and chromatin remodeling, demonstrating how conventional nuclear counterstaining can reveal rapid chromatin changes at damage sites, offering new perspectives for investigating genome stability in live cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.