ArticleInternational ophthalmology2026
Prevalence and severity of dry eye disease among ophthalmologists, optometrists, and nurses: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular condition that, if left untreated, can lead to visual impairment. The present study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of DED among ophthalmologists, optometrists, and nurses.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included ophthalmologists, optometrists, and nurses who attended the Emirates Society of Ophthalmology (ESO) conference in 2024 in the United Arab Emirates. Eligible participants were asked to complete the Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5), based on which the presence and severity of DED were assessed.
resultsThe study included 203 participants (53.2% males), with the majority being ophthalmologists (47.8%), followed by nurses (17.2%), optometrists (13.8%), and others (21.2%). The overall prevalence of DED was 82.8%. DED prevalence was significantly higher among females than males (88.4% vs 77.8%, p = 0.046), and female optometrists had a 4.36-fold higher risk of DED than male optometrists (p = 0.013). Regarding DED severity, 27.6% of the participants had mild DED, 35.5% had moderate DED, and 19.7% had severe DED. Females who worked as ophthalmologists (RR = 1.72, p = 0.045) and those engaged in other professions (RR = 3.31, p = 0.002) had a significantly higher risk of severe DED.
conclusionThis study highlights alarmingly high rates of DED among ocular care professionals. Female optometrists had a significantly higher risk of DED than male optometrists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41697442What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.