Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41697751›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical investigation2026

The BIOPREVENT machine-learning algorithm predicts chronic graft-versus-host disease and mortality risk using posttransplant biomarkers.

Michael J Martens, Debjani Dutta, Yongzi Yu, Lisa E Rein, Jerome Ritz, Brent R Logan, Sophie Paczesny

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02194439 (Bridging Pediatric and Adult Biomarkers in Graft-Versus-Host Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02194439 completednot on this map

Bridging Pediatric and Adult Biomarkers in Graft-Versus-Host Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2014 to 2019Enrolled415ConditionsGraft-Versus-Host Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael J MartensDivision of Biostatistics and.
Debjani DuttaHollings Cancer Center and.
Yongzi YuCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Lisa E ReinDivision of Biostatistics and.
Jerome RitzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brent R LoganDivision of Biostatistics and.
Sophie PaczesnyHollings Cancer Center and.

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network DCC- The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.U24HL138660 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Steven M. DeVine, Mehdi Hussain Hamadani · 2017 to 2026
$71.4M
Translating Novel Drug-Targetable Biomarkers to Treat Graft versus Host DiseaseR01CA168814 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PACZESNY, SOPHIE · 2013 to 2024
$3.0M
Machine Learning to identify Biomarkers for Risk of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host DiseaseR01CA264921 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Brent R Logan, Sophie Paczesny · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168814NCI NIH HHS R01 CA264921NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL138660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDChronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major contributor to nonrelapse mortality (NRM) following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Whether machine-learning (ML) models with biomarkers improve the accuracy for predicting future cGVHD/NRM is not established.METHODSWe developed BIOPREVENT (BIOmarkers PREVENTion), a ML algorithm using data from 1,310 HCT recipients, incorporating 7 plasma proteins measured at Day 90/100 post-HCT and 9 clinical variables. Patients were divided into training and validation datasets. ML models - including CoxXGBoost, Group SCAD, Adaptive Group Lasso, Random Survival Forests, and Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) - were used to estimate time-varying Area Under the ROC Curve (AUCt) at Days 180, 270, 360, and 540. Deep learning models were also evaluated.RESULTSML models with biomarkers outperformed clinical-only models for predicting cGVHD, with BART and CoxXGBoost achieving AUCt greater than 0.65 at 1 year. For NRM, models with biomarkers achieved AUCt ranging from 0.75-0.91. Deep learning did not outperform other ML approaches. BART consistently demonstrated high predictive accuracy and was selected for the final BIOPREVENT model. Calibration curves aligned with observed values. Variable importance analysis identified MMP3 and CXCL9 as key for cGVHD prediction and IL1RL1 and sCD163 for NRM. Cumulative incidences of cGVHD and NRM differed significantly based on BIOPREVENT-defined cutpoints.CONCLUSIONBIOPREVENT accurately predicts individual risk of future cGVHD and NRM using biomarkers at 3 months post-HCT. A publicly available R Shiny web application supports its clinical use. Further studies are needed to explore its role in guiding preemptive therapy.TRIAL REGISTRATIONBMTCTN 0201, BMTCTN 1202, and NCT02194439.FUNDINGR01CA264921, U10HL069294, U24HL138660, R01HD074587, and P01HL158505.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsAdultBiomarkersChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsBiomarkersInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinBiomarkersClinical ResearchHematologyMachine learningProteomics

Identifiers

PMID41697751
PMCPMC12904722

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.