Observational studyEuropean journal of public health2026
External validation of the Electronic Screening Index of Frailty (e-SIF) in a population of 1.4 million inhabitants aged 65 years and older.
Observational study in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Electronic Screening Index of Frailty (e-SIF) was first validated in 2022 in a sample of 9315 people, but further studies in larger populations were recommended to corroborate those findings. The objective was to evaluate e-SIF construct validity, in a large and independent sample from that used for its initial validation, by analysing score associations with age, sex, hospitalizations, institutionalizations, mortality, and health resource use. An observational 2-year longitudinal study (2018-2019) was conducted of the Catalan population aged ≥65 years (1.4 million people) using retrospectively collected data. Frailty was established according to e-SIF score. Study variables included sociodemographic characteristics, mortality, hospitalizations, institutionalizations, primary care visits, emergency visits, and day hospital sessions during the study period. The study included 1 465 312 people (mean age 75.8 years, 57.2% women). Frailty prevalence was 14.0% in women and 9.1% in men (P < .001) and progressively increased with age from 2.2% in the 65-69 age group to 38.9% in ≥95 age group. As frailty status increased, mortality, hospitalizations, institutionalizations, and health resource use also increased. Hospitalization-free survival and institutionalization-free survival worsened as frailty increased. Multivariate logistic regression models based on all 42 e-SIF items showed areas under the curve of 0.85, 0.75, and 0.82 in predicting 1-year mortality, hospitalizations, and institutionalizations, respectively. This large study corroborates the findings of the initial e-SIF validation study and reaffirms its good construct validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.