ArticleScientific reports2026
Profiling the epigenomic landscape of late embryonic and adult mouse hind limb muscles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Vitro Massively Parallel Screening of Human Regulatory Elements Involved in Postcranial Skeletal Development for Differential Activity Compared to Chimpanzee.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal muscles are essential for movement, supporting a wide range of locomotor behaviors. Muscle tissue is composed of multiple cell types including "fast" and "slow" myofibers, whose contractile properties are largely influenced by selective expression of myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoforms. While 'super-enhancers' regulating MyHC gene clusters have been identified, the cis-regulatory elements (CREs) controlling non-MyHC genes important to myofiber physiology remain less defined. Here, we profile the regulatory landscape of two pairs of mouse hind limb muscles differing in MyHC expression at a late embryonic (E18.5) and adult time point to identify candidate CREs that may regulate genes important to myofiber type. Gene expression and chromatin accessibility analyses revealed that epigenetic differences at E18.5 largely reflect limb patterning, whereas adult differences reflect myofiber differentiation. We identified thousands of differentially accessible regions that may regulate genes important for muscle development, muscle biology, and myofiber identity. Among these, twelve conserved, muscle-specific CREs associated with myofiber type were tested for regulatory activity. Nine enhanced and three reduced gene activity in vitro, although their phenotypic effects remain unknown. By profiling multiple muscles across two time points, our study extends current understanding of conserved, muscle-specific CREs that regulate gene expression during myogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.