Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41698969›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Performance evaluation of generative pre-trained transformer on the National Veterinary Licensing Examination in Japan.

Takahiro Kako, Daiki Kato, Takaaki Iguchi, Shiyu Qin, Miki Ando, Shoma Koseki, Hayato Shibahara, Haruka Motoi, Rin Isaka, Namiko Ikeda and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Takahiro KakoLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Daiki KatoLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan. adk@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Takaaki IguchiLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Shiyu QinLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Miki AndoLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Shoma KosekiLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Hayato ShibaharaLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Haruka MotoiLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Rin IsakaLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Namiko IkedaLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Hiroto ToyodaLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Takayuki NakagawaLaboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences/Faculty of Agriculture, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models, which are large language models based on the transformer architecture, have enabled natural-language interaction with humans. GPT models have demonstrated high scores on National Medical Licensing Examination in various countries with translation. However, their performance on the National Veterinary Licensing Examination (NVLE) in Japan has not yet been explored. In this study, we evaluated GPT-4o, o1, and o3 on the 74th (2023) NVLE in Japan to compare the models, prompt designs (normal vs. optimized), and languages (Japanese vs. English). We then validated the best performance on the 75th (2024) and 76th (2025) NVLE using o3 with Japanese input and the normal prompt. As a result, o3 with Japanese input and the Normal prompt achieved the highest performance on the 74th NVLE, and both o1 and o3 outperformed GPT-4o. Furthermore, the validation tests using the 75th and 76th NVLE showed that o3 exceeded the minimum passing scoring rate in all sections, achieving an overall score of 92.9%. These findings indicate that recent GPT models can reliably answer the Japanese NVLE without requiring translation or elaborate prompt engineering, highlighting their potential as supportive tools in veterinary education and knowledge assistance in Japan.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementVeterinary MedicineAnimalsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansJapanLarge Language ModelsArtificial intelligenceGenerative pre-trained transformerJapaneseLarge language modelLicensing examination

Identifiers

PMID41698969
PMCPMC12909958

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.