ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative analysis of body parameters for fracture and post-healing patient using a non-invasive bioimpedance device.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone fracture assessment and follow-up commonly rely on imaging techniques such as X-ray and CT, which, although effective, involve radiation exposure and limited feasibility for frequent monitoring. This study presents a comparative analysis of body impedance parameters in fractured and non-fractured individuals to explore the potential of bio-impedance as a non-invasive diagnostic and monitoring tool. Data were collected from 65 patients during the fracture phase and after complete healing, allowing direct comparison of electrical characteristics associated with tissue recovery. The study focused on key parameters such as impedance magnitude, and phase angle to assess their variation with bone healing. A portable bio-impedance measurement device was developed to acquire real-time data with high accuracy and reproducibility. The results indicate consistent within-subject trends, with higher impedance and phase angle values observed in the post-healing condition. These findings suggest that segmental BIA measurements may reflect changes associated with fracture recovery; however, no causal physiological mechanisms are inferred. The developed system proved effective in capturing these physiological transitions without the need for invasive or radiological procedures. This work establishes bio-impedance analysis as a promising, safe, and cost-effective approach for monitoring bone healing and assessing fracture status. The proposed device can serve as a valuable clinical tool for orthopedic applications, enabling early detection of healing progress and personalized rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.