ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative evaluation of stability, efficacy, and sterility in five repackaged intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intravitreal injection anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs offer significant benefits for individuals with retinal diseases, yet high cost and limited availability impede widespread use. Compounding and repackaging present a potential strategy for better drug utilization; however, earlier studies addressing the efficacy and sterility of repackaged anti-VEGF drugs focused on individual or few drugs, limiting their ability to provide comparative insights across different drugs and experimental settings. In this study, we survey the stability, efficacy, and sterility of five intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs, namely aflibercept, bevacizumab, brolucizumab, faricimab, and ranibizumab, after repackaging and storage for 14, 30, and 60 days. The drugs were aseptically repackaged into a minimum of three syringes per time points, which were all examined using one consistent protocol comprising six different experimental techniques: spectrophotometry, sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and microbial plating. All five intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs can be repackaged and stored in Tuberculin-type syringes up to 60 days, while maintaining sterility up to 60 days with minimal changes in protein concentrations, degradation products, aggregation, and functional binding to VEGF-A, if appropriate aseptic protocols are followed. Specific differences observed in biophysical properties between drugs were noted and discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.