Evidence mapPaperPMID 41698993Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparative evaluation of stability, efficacy, and sterility in five repackaged intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medications.

Panintorn Thunwiriya, Tanaporn Phetruen, Phaewa Chaiwijit, Chaiyawat Tonawannakorn, Kanokwan Dekham, Nalumon Thadtapong, Soraya Chaturongakul, Varodom Charoensawan, Sittinan Chanarat, Danaya Pakotiprapha and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Panintorn Thunwiriya *School of Ophthalmology, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. panintorn@sut.ac.th.
Tanaporn Phetruen *Center for Excellence in Protein and Enzyme Technology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Phaewa Chaiwijit *Division of Medical Bioinformatics, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chaiyawat TonawannakornDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kanokwan DekhamDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nalumon ThadtapongDepartment of Medical Sciences, National Institute of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Soraya ChaturongakulCenter for Advanced Therapeutics, Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Varodom CharoensawanDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. varodom.cha@mahidol.ac.th.
Sittinan ChanaratCenter for Excellence in Protein and Enzyme Technology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. sittinan.cha@mahidol.ac.th.
Danaya PakotipraphaCenter for Excellence in Protein and Enzyme Technology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. danaya.pak@mahidol.ac.th.
Prut HanutsahaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. prut.han@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand N42A670557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravitreal injection anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs offer significant benefits for individuals with retinal diseases, yet high cost and limited availability impede widespread use. Compounding and repackaging present a potential strategy for better drug utilization; however, earlier studies addressing the efficacy and sterility of repackaged anti-VEGF drugs focused on individual or few drugs, limiting their ability to provide comparative insights across different drugs and experimental settings. In this study, we survey the stability, efficacy, and sterility of five intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs, namely aflibercept, bevacizumab, brolucizumab, faricimab, and ranibizumab, after repackaging and storage for 14, 30, and 60 days. The drugs were aseptically repackaged into a minimum of three syringes per time points, which were all examined using one consistent protocol comprising six different experimental techniques: spectrophotometry, sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and microbial plating. All five intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs can be repackaged and stored in Tuberculin-type syringes up to 60 days, while maintaining sterility up to 60 days with minimal changes in protein concentrations, degradation products, aggregation, and functional binding to VEGF-A, if appropriate aseptic protocols are followed. Specific differences observed in biophysical properties between drugs were noted and discussed.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsDrug PackagingVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ABevacizumabDrug StabilityDrug StorageHumansIntravitreal InjectionsRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ACompounding pharmacyIntravitreal anti-VEGFRepackaging drugsStorage times

Identifiers

PMID41698993
PMCPMC13000269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.